Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89271 (KAR)

IND-SING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER LAND ACQUISITION(TDR)

WP/19315/2023 · 2025-10-31

R Nataraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43813 WP No. 19315 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 19315 OF 2023 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: IND-SING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.208, WESTMINSTER NO.13, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 052. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR, M. KRISHNA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KASHYAP N. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LAND ACQUISITION(TDR) BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, NO.107, 1ST FLOOR, ANNEXURE BUILDING 3, BBMP, HEAD OFFICE, N R SQUARE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 002. 2. M. MANJUNATH REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O. K MUNISWAMY REDDY, 3. M. SRINIVAS REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, SON OF K MUNISWAMY REDDY, BOTH RESIDING AT CHIKKABELLANDURU VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43813 WP No. 19315 of 2023 BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 087. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.B.MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SANJAY NAIR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. ISSUE DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT No.1 RESTRAINING FROM GRANTING ANY DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS CERTIFICATE OR TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS IN FAVOUR OF THE RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 PURSUANT TO THE NOTIFICATION DATED 28/12/2020 BEARING NO.BBMP/COMM/PSR(G)/4999/20-21 (ANNEXURE-E) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of dismissal of main petition, pending interlocutory applications if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand rejected. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10