IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5206 OF 2025 Between: 1. Malli Reddy Surya Chandra, S/o. Kalyana Rao, Aged 48 years, R/o. Q.No. C-8, RIMS Hospital Quarters, Srikakulam. 2. Malli Reddy Venkata lakshmi, W/o. Dr.Malli Reddy Surya Chandra, R/o. Q.No. C-8, RIMS Hospital Quarters, Srikakulam, Rep by their GPA holder Dokkari Srinivasa Rao, S/o. Bangarayya, Aged 46 years, R/o. 9- 9-77, Mangapuram Colony, Losensbay Colony Post, Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Opp.Andhra University, main gate, Visakhapatnam. 3. The Station House officer, MVP Police Station, Visakhapatnam. 4. Dasari Markandeya Rao, S/o. Krishnamurthy late, aged 65 years, D.No.22-130/4, Swatanthra Nagar Colony, Madhuravada, Visakhapatnam 5. Dasari Anupama, W/o. Markandeya Rao, aged 65 years, D.No. 22- 130/4, Swatanthra Nagar Colony, Madhuravada, Visakhapatnam. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2'^'^ and 3 respondents in providing police aid to the petitioner's property admeasuring total to an extent to Flat No. 147,Door No.9-34-1/1, RCC rd Building, Pithapuram colony, visakhapatnam, inspite of permanent injunction orders in favour of the petitioner in lA 540/2017 in OS No. 859/2017, Dt. 18.08.2017 on the file of VI senior civil judge ,Visakhapatnam District, for implementing the orders passed in lA 540/2017 in OS No. 859/2017, Dt.18.08.2017 on the file of VI senior civil judge, Visakhapatnam District as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 2'^'^ and 3 respondents to pass orders on the representation dated .03.2024. rd lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"^^^ and 3'"'^ respondents to provide police aid to the petitioner's property admeasuring total to admeasuring total to an extent to Flat No.1,47, Door No.9-34-1/1, RCC Building, Pithapuram Colony, visakhapatnam, inspite of permanent injunction orders in favour of the petitioner in lA 540/2017 in OS No. 859/2017, Dt. 18.08.2017 on the file of VI senior civil judge Visakhapatnam District and consider the representation made by the petitioners before the 3'"'^ respondent dated .03.2024. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER t’ APHC010097562025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 050 0:S^ [3457] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5206/2025 Between; ...PETITIONER(S) Main Reddy Surya Chandra and Others AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GPFOR HOME The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed O.S.No.859 of 2017, on the file of the VI Senior Civil Judge, Vishakhapatnam, against the respondent Nos.4 It is submitted that the learned judge has granted an injunction restraining respondent Nos.4 and 5 from interfering with the petitioners' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. It is submitted that the property bearing No.9- 34-1/1 on plot No.147, Pithapuram Colony, Vishakhapatnam, is the subject of the suit schedule property. The respondents are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioners, though and 5. 2 there is an order of injunction passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Vishakhapatnam. In this regard, the petitioners have submitted a representation to the 3'^'^ respondent, but the 3 rd respondent has not acted on it. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that, the petitioners' representation is undated and does not appear any endorsement. Considering the submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose off the writ petition, by directing the petitioners to submit a proper representation to the 3'"'^ respondent. The 3'"'^ respondent 3. shall take necessary action in accordance with law if the petitioners submit such a representation. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed off. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall SDl- N.NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR stand closed. //TRUE COPY// FICER SEC To, 1. The Principle Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi 3. The Station House officer, MVP Police Station, 4. One CC to Sri M. Sapthagiri, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, 6. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr State of Andhra Pradesh Guntur District. . main gate. Visakhapatnam. High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] > HIGH COURT DATED:05/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.5206 of 2025 ^ 2J MAR 2025 i i<9,^ . Current Section ^4£espATC*;^^ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS