HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31498 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sunit Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Applicants seek bail in Case Crime No. 79 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Madhogarh, District Jalaun, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicants on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which they have already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in paragraph no.7 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. They have been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. They are not the member of any gang. 5. Learned counsel has further stated that there is a criminal history of five cases against the applicants, which has been explained in paragraph no.10 of the affidavit filed with the bail application. The applicants are languishing in jail since 24.06.2025 In case, the applicants are released on bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the bail application Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sankalp Pratap Singh, Sunit Kumar, Yatish Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anil Kanjad And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicants. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicants - Anil Kanjad and Ramkesh, who are involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicants shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicants shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicants shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 15, 2025 Sumit S BAIL No. 31498 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad