1 2025:CGHC:8596-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 239 of 2021 1 - Aalisha Meman W/o Mohd. Aslam Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 9, Jhilmila, P. S. Saraipali District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 2 - Mohd. Aslam S/o Late Abdul Rajik Aged About 53 Years R/o Ward No. 9, Jhilmila, Presently R/o Purana Gandhi Chowk, Ward No. 8/11, P. S. Shahdol, Tahsil Suhagpur, District Shahdol Madhya Pradesh 3 - Mohd. Anas S/o Mohd. Aslam Aged About 19 Years R/o Ward No. 9, Jhilmila, Presently R/o Purana Gandhi Chowk, Ward No. 8/11, P. S. Shahdol, Tahsil Suhagpur, District Shahdol Madhya Pradesh 4 - Mohd. Aasif S/o Mohd. Aslam Aged About 21 Years R/o Ward No. 9, Jhilmila, Presently R/o Purana Gandhi Chowk, Ward No. 8/11, P. S. Shahdol, Tahsil Suhagpur, District Shahdol Madhya Pradesh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 2 - Gulbaksha Meman W/o Imtiz Meman Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 9, Jhilmila, P. S. Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Tandon, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. S. Ubeja, Panel Lawyer. 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19/02/2025 1. Heard Mr. Suresh Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. S.S. Ubeja, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the respondent/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and set-aside/quash the FIR No. 492/2020 registered by the police station Saraipali, District Mahasamund, and acquit the petitioner from the charges in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners do not want to press the press petition, as the matter has been compromised between the parties and the same has become infructuous. 4. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners is not disputed by the counsel appearing for the respondents. 5. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.02.25 10:52:47 +0530