Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89258 (ALL)

CHANDAN KUMAR MAURYA v. State of UP AND ANOTHER

A482/27871/2024 · 2025-05-18

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83285 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27871 of 2024 Applicant :- Chandan Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Harindra Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Suneel Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Ms. Suneeta Chauhan Advocate holding brief for Sri Suneel Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the Charge Sheet dated 15.08.2022 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 21190/2022 Computerized Filing No. 29088/22. State Versus. Chandan Kumar Maurya, Case Crime No. 0122/2022, under sections 354(GA), 506, I.P.C., Police Station-Haldharpur, District-Mau. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated 07.01.2025, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre, High Court, Allahabad. As per Mediation report dated 17.04.2025, the parties could not appear before the Mediation, hence the Mediation failed. 4. Counsel for the applicant has not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicant. 6. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicant through this application is refused. 7. However, considering the alternative prayer of the applicant, it is directed that applicant shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 922. 8. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. 9. With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.5.2025 Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad