Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89247 (PNJ)

LAKHMI CHAND ALIAS LAXMI CHAND v. MAHAVIR KAUSHIK AND ORS

COCP/3499/2024 · 2025-07-21

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-3499 156 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Lakhmi Chand @ Laxmi Chand Mahavir Kaushik and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present : HARKESH MANUJA, application hearing has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. 2. that the order sought, stands complie 3. not press the present petition same. 4. 5. 6. stand disposed of 21.07.2025 sanjay 3499-2024 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. Date of Decision: Lakhmi Chand @ Laxmi Chand VERSUS Mahavir Kaushik and ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present : Mr.Man Mohan, Advocate Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Addl.A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Since the main petition is also listed today, therefore, the application bearing CM-4805-CII-2025 for preponing the date of hearing has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. Learned counsel representing that the order qua which the contempt proceedings have been sought, stands complied with by way of passing a speaking order In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition, however, seeks liberty to challenge the Dismissed as not pressed with liberty aforesaid. Rule discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if an stand disposed of. 21.07.2025 ( Whether speaking/reasoned ? Whether Reportable ? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 3499-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.07.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Man Mohan, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Puneeta Sethi, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Since the main petition is also listed today, therefore, the 2025 for preponing the date of hearing has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. Learned counsel representing the respondents submits which the contempt proceedings have been by way of passing a speaking order. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does , however, seeks liberty to challenge the Dismissed as not pressed with liberty aforesaid. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No Yes/No ...Respondents Since the main petition is also listed today, therefore, the 2025 for preponing the date of hearing has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. the respondents submits which the contempt proceedings have been In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does , however, seeks liberty to challenge the y, shall also SANJAY GUPTA 2025.07.21 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document