Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89236 (ALL)

DILIP SRIVASTAVA AND 5 OTHERS v. MOHAMMAD ANWAR SIDDIQUI AND 2 OTHERS

A227/9786/2025 · 2025-10-06

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9786 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. On the objection made by learned counsel for the respondent, learned counsel for petitioners submits that he does not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed with liberty to file revision under Section 25 of Provincial Small Causes Courts Act, 1887. 2. In view of said fact, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. 3. Office to return certified copy of the order to petitioners' counsel, within 48 hours. October 7, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shobhna Srivastava, Sudhanshu Narain Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arvind Srivastava Iii (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Dilip Srivastava And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) Mohammad Anwar Siddiqui And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad