- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26642 WP NO.12301 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.12301 OF 2025 (KLR-REG) BETWEEN: HASSAN A.M. S/O MUKRI MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, GULUMBU HOUSE, AJJAVARA VILLAGE AND POST, SULLIA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 239. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JEEVAN K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAJATHADRI, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI - 576 225. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, PUTTUR TALUK, PUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 201. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, SULLIA TALUK, SULLIA, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 939. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26642 WP NO.12301 OF 2025 5. THE WAQF OFFICER DISTRICT WAQF OFFICE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALURU - 575 001. 6. MUHIYADDEEN JUMA MASJID AJJAVAR VILLAGE AND POST, SULIA TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA. REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.4-TAHSILDAR, SULLIA TALUK TO CONDUCT RE-ENQUIRY IN NCRSR:356/91-92, 201/98-99 AS PER THE DIRECTIONS PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3- ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SULLIA IN CASE NO.ADS R.E.V.S.R:274/2014-15 DATED 29TH JULY, 2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND TO PASS NECESSARY ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 4. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent No.4-Tahsildar, Sulia Taluk to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26642 WP NO.12301 OF 2025 conduct re-enquiry in NCRSR:356/91-92 and NCRSR:201/98- 99 in terms of the order dated 29th July, 2018 (Annexure-A) passed by the respondent No.3-Assitant Commissioner in Case No.ADS R.E.V.S.R:274/14-15. 3. Heard Sri. Jeevan K., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Siddharth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 4. 4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the writ petition, the same would indicate that the writ of mandamus is sought for in this writ petition without approaching the respondent No.4. Therefore, I am of the view that, no interference be called for in this writ petition to issue writ of mandamus, however, it is open for the petitioner to approach the respondent No.4 in accordance with law. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22