HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29326 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Yogesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 245 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 109, 127(2) of BNS and Section 3/25/27 of Arms Act, Police Station Bilari, District Moradabad, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have fired at the informant as he was driving motorcycle by stopping him enroute on 29.05.2024 at about 4 p.m. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence. The FIR is delayed by more than seven hours and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. 6. Learned counsel has next stated that no bullets or pallets were found from the body of the injured person. The said organ which is stated to have sustained injury is hand which is not a vital organ of the body. 7. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 02.06.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Noor Muhammad, Yogesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ritik Sanklan Alias Ritik Chaudhary .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 8. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Ritik Sanklan Alias Ritik Chaudhary, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 10, 2025 Sumit S BAIL No. 29326 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad