PADAM CAHND AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/22935/2025 · 2025-08-08
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89220 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89220 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
( Sr. No. 118 )
CWP No.22935 of 2025
Date of decision: 08.08.2025
Padam Chand and others .....Petitioners
Versus
The State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Ms. Sumitra, Advocate for
Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana.
* * *
DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) (1)
At the outset, learned State counsel submits that during pendency of the executive revision petition No.74 of 2024-25 pending before the Commissioner, Faridabad Division, Faridabad, the State shall not act on the notice dated 26.06.2025 issued by the Block Development and Panchayat Officer, Pinangwan (Annexure P-63). (2)
The afore statement satisfies learned counsel for the petitioners. (3)
Disposed of.
( DEEPAK SIBAL )
JUDGE
08.08.2025
( LAPITA BANERJI ) sunil yadav
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No SUNIL YADAV 2025.08.18 18:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order. Chandigarh