Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8921 (UTT)

MOHSEEN AHMED SIDDIQUI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/785/2025 · 2025-08-22

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7468 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 22.08. 2025 ABA No.785 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Mr. Rafat Munir Ali, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State. 2. Heard on the Withdrawal Application (IA No.1 of 2025). 3. Learned counsel for the applicants on instruction has requested to permit the applicants to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application. 4. The said request has not been opposed by the State. 5. The present Anticipatory Bail Application (ABA No.785 of 2025) is dismissed as withdrawn. (Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 22.08.2025 Pant/