LANDMARK WELFARE ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/29421/2025 · 2025-10-08
Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89209 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89209 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29421 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Sri Udit Chandra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2.The petitioner, being aggrieved by the electricity bill dated 06.02.2024 issued by respondent no. 2, has submitted a representation before the said respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent no. 2 is sitting tight over the matter and has not taken any decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner.
3. Sri Udit Chandra, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner as the decision is to be taken by the respondent no.2.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation against the bill dated 6.2.2024 alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.2-Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division (EDD), Purvanchal Vidyut Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dev Raj Chowdhary, Nikhil Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Udit Chandra Landmark Welfare Association .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Vitran Nigam Ltd, Varunapar, Varanasi within a period of four weeks from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. October 9, 2025 Gaurav WRIC No. 29421 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad