Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8920 (RAJ)

BRAJ RAJ SINGH HADA S/O SHRI BHARAT SINGH HADA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3061/2025 · 2025-03-04

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3061/2025 Braj Raj Singh Hada S/o Shri Bharat Singh Hada, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ganesh Bag Road, Devpura Dist. Bundi Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur Raj. 2. The Director General of Police, Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi Jaipur Raj. 3. The Additional Director General of Police, (Recruitment and Promotion Board), Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi Jaipur Raj.) 4. The Inspector General of Police (Recruitment), Kota Range Kota, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Santosh Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/03/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievance, the petitioner approached the authorities concerned by way of filing a detailed comprehensive representation on 04.05.2023, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, the said representation has not been decided on its merits by the authority concerned by passing a reasoned and speaking order. Counsel submits that appropriate directions be issued to the authority concerned (2 of 2) [CW-3061/2025] to decide the same expeditiously, as early as possible within a time frame. 2. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with directions to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 3. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/ direction to the respondents to decide the said representation in particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly on its merits in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/31