Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89185 (KAR)

SRI N YOGESH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13546/2023 · 2025-10-15

S Vishwajith Shetty

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41534 WP No. 13546 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY WRIT PETITION NO. 13546 OF 2023 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. N. YOGESH, S/O. NAGARAJ N, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, 2. SMT SHWETA V.C, W/O. N. YOGESH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT NO.149, KARNATAKA LAYOUT, 1ST CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD, 2ND STAGE, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 086. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PADMANABHA R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE REGISTRAR FOR SOCIETIES, PHASE 1, BENGALURU CITY DISTRICT, Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41534 WP No. 13546 of 2023 NO.146, SAHAKARA SOUDHA, 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. 3. SMT KRISHNAVENI, W/O NAGARAJACHAR, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.78/2, III CROSS, FLAT NO.104, RAGHAVA RESIDENCY, S.V.K. LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 086. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RADHA RAMASWAMY, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. JAYAKUMAR S. PATIL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. SUMANTH KUMAR S. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO.1027/2022-23 DATED 16.02.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-O, DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT NOT TO PROCEED WITH HOLDING ANY MEETING OF THE UNIVERSAL EDUCATION SOCIETY IN PURSUANCE TO THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT DATED 16.02.2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, VIDE ANNEXURE-O AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41534 WP No. 13546 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the contesting respondents submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the submission and he submits that petition may be dismissed as not pressed. 3. Submission placed on record. Accordingly, petition is dismissed not pressed. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE KVR CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0