YATENDRA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/32422/2025 · 2025-10-09
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89182 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89182 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32422 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and and learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. This present application has been filed for seeking quashing of chargesheet dated 22.03.2025 along with cognizance order dated 05.05.2025 and entire proceeding of Case No.1755 of 2025 (State Vs. Yatendra and others), arising out of Case Crime No.0046 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 74, 115(2), 351(3), 333 BNS, P.S. Sikandra Rau, District Hathras, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Sikandra Rau, Hathras. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet along with entire material available on record, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shantanu Pandey, Shashi Kant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajit Kumar, G.A. Yatendra And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that till four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. 8.
It is also made clear that if the bail are granted to applicants by learned court concerned, applicant no.5, who is a lady, will be at liberty to put her appearance before learned court concerned through her counsel during course of trial. October 10, 2025 Vivek Kr. NA528 No. 32422 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad