SMT. VARALAKSHMI L v. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND APPOINTING AUTHORITY
WP/34062/2025 · 2025-12-12
Ashok S Kinagi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89176 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89176 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52946 WP No. 34062 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 34062 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. VARALAKSHMI L, W/O H S JAYACHANDRA, D/O LATE M LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO. 68, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND CROSS, GEETHA MANDIRA ROAD, J P NAGAR, BENGALURU-560006.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI.BASAVARAJA PATEL G K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND APPOINTING AUTHORITY, BENGALURU URBAN ZILLA PANCHAYATH,
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52946 WP No. 34062 of 2025
BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENT (BY SMT.VARSHA.K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.K.M.PRAKASH., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING A MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.07.2025 MADE BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-F AND FURTHER DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT TO ISSUE
ORDER OF COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT TO THE PETITIONER HAVING REGARD TO HER QUALIFICATION AND AGE IN ANY SUITABLE POST, WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS WITHOUT FURTHER LOSS OF TIME.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52946 WP No. 34062 of 2025
ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking a Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 22.07.2025 vide Annexure-F, wherein the petitioner requested the respondent to issue an order of compassionate appointment to the petitioner. The respondent has not passed any order on the representation submitted by the petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition.
2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that if reasonable time is granted, the respondent would consider the representation and pass an appropriate order in accordance with.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent, I proceed to pass the following
order.
4. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider the representation dated
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52946 WP No. 34062 of 2025
22.07.2025 vide Annexure-F, and pass an appropriate
order in accordance with law within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47