HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 12486 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Rundra Kant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 & 2, and Sri Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 3 & 4. 2. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition challenging an order dated 07.08.2025 passed by respondent no. 4 - District Basic Education Officer, Sonbhadra, to the extent of his transfer from Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya, Forest Village Jugail, Chopan to Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Nagva, Sonbhadra. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working as an Accountant in Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya, Forest Village Jugail, Chopan, on contractual basis since 2009. By the order impugned his services have been renewed, however, he has been transferred to Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya Nagva, Sonbhadra, in violation of the relevant Government Order as there is no such circumstance for which the petitioner should have been transferred. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the petitioner has already joined at the transferred place on 28.08.2025 and has represented before the authority concerned to consider his grievance, however, nothing has been brought about as yet. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the basis of instructions, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rudra Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shivendra Kumar Singh, C.S.C. Raj Narayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) informs that there are numerous complaints against the petitioner about his working and various litigations have been preferred by him, even otherwise there is no illegality in the transfer of the petitioner as it is in accordance with the Government order. 5. In view of the above, no case is made out in favour of the petitioner and the writ petition lacks merit. It is accordingly dismissed. 6. Needless to say that in case the petitioner files any representation before the authority concerned, it may be considered in accordance with law September 12, 2025 DS WRIA No. 12486 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad