Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89150 (KAR)

SMT SAVITHRAMMA v. MAHADEVA M

MFA/4466/2023 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.4466/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No.8800/2025) BETWEEN 1 . SMT SAVITHRAMMA D/O CHIKKAMADAIAH, W/O LATE RAJESHA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 2 . LAKSHMI S/O LATE RAJESHA, AGED ABOUT 08 YEARS, APPELLANT NO.2 MINOR REP BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT SAVITHRAMMA 3 . SMT SIDDAMMA W/O RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RANGASWAMY SINCE DEAD BY LRS Digitally signed by DEEPU M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 4 . KUSUMA D/O RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT KARIJANA STREET, KOTHARANGAIAHNA DODDI VILLAGE, SATHEGALA, PALYA HOBLI, KOLLEGALA TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT 571313 ...APPELLANTS (By SRI. GIREESHA S. N., ADVOCATE) AND 1 . MAHADEVA M S/O MUTHUNAYAKA, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, R/AT NAL ROAD, THANDA, MARTALLI POST, KOLLEGALA TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT 571313 2 . THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD, BALLAL CIRCLE, CHAMRAJAPURAM, MYSURU 57005 RESPONDENTS (By SRI. JANARDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DT.11.03.2022 PASSED IN MVC NO.180/2019 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT, KOLLEGALA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.3,10,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Ten Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of the enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of the judgment and award passed by the claims tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER TS