IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (233) Abjit Singh. State of Punjab and Ors. CORAM: Present: LISA GILL, J. (Oral) 1. passed by respondent No.5, whereby claim of the arrears has been rejected. 2. 04.05.2023 submits that certain benefits have subsequently been released to the petitioner. Copy of communication is taken on record subject to just exceptions. 3. petitioner on the last there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It appears that petitioner interested in pursuing the matter any longer. 4. prosecution. March 25, 2025. manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Punjab and Ors. HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** None for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. **** LISA GILL, J. (Oral) Prayer in this writ petition is for quashing order dated 28.06.2022 by respondent No.5, whereby claim of the has been rejected. Learned counsel for State while referring to communication d submits that certain benefits have subsequently been released to the Copy of communication is taken on record subject to just exceptions. Perusal of the file reveals that none had appeared on behalf of petitioner on the last date when the case was taken up for hearing. Today, again there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It appears that petitioner interested in pursuing the matter any longer. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed in default/for non 2025. Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25340-2022 Date of Decision:-25.03.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. Shekhar Verma, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Prayer in this writ petition is for quashing order dated 28.06.2022 by respondent No.5, whereby claim of the petitioner for revised pension ile referring to communication dated submits that certain benefits have subsequently been released to the Copy of communication is taken on record subject to just exceptions. Perusal of the file reveals that none had appeared on behalf of was taken up for hearing. Today, again there is no representation on behalf of petitioner. It appears that petitioner is not Writ petition is accordingly dismissed in default/for non- (LISA GILL) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Petitioner s Prayer in this writ petition is for quashing order dated 28.06.2022 petitioner for revised pension ated submits that certain benefits have subsequently been released to the Perusal of the file reveals that none had appeared on behalf of was taken up for hearing. Today, again not - Manju 2025.04.01 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document