106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3947-2025 Date of decision: 27.08.2025 Jagdeep ...Petitioner Versus Vinay Kumar and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Govind Mor, Advocate and Mr. Amit Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State Counsel has submitted that in compliance to the order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court, a detailed speaking order has been passed which has been handed over to the Court during the course of arguments and is taken on record and marked as Mark “A” and a copy of the same has been given to learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not satisfied with the said speaking order and has submitted that the present contempt petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to challenge the said order in accordance with law. 3. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. 27.08.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.08.27 14:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document