Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89132 (ALL)

PRABODH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/28963/2025 · 2025-09-22

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28963 of 2025 Court No. - 29 (SL No.4) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Shukla, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel for respondent no.2; Sri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for respondents no.3 and 4 and Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. At the outset Sri Pranjal Mehrotra and Sri K.M. Asthana, learned counsel for the respondents raised an objection that no cause of action has arisen in the territorial jurisdiction of High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. In fact, the matter is cognizable at Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court. 3. Confronted with this situation, Sri Amit Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant petition may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to press the relief before Lucknow Bench of this Court. 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid leave. September 23, 2025 Shubham Arya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Shukla, Nisheeth Yadav, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Krishna Mohan Asthana, Nipun Singh, Pranjal Mehrotra (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Prabodh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad