Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51732 WP No. 32194 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 32194 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI SHARATH B R S/O. RAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT SULUGODU SOMAVARA VILLAGE, KONANOOR HOBLI, ARAKALAGUDU-573 102, HASSAN DISTRICT.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. K C SHANTAKUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDINGS, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573 201.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAKALESHPURA SUB DIVISION, SAKALESHPURA-573 127 Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51732 WP No. 32194 of 2025
4.
THE TAHASILDAR ARAKALAGUDU TALUK-573 102 HASSAN DISTRICT.
5.
SRI. THIRTHARAMA S/O. LATE CARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT SULUGODU SOMAVARA VILLAGE, KONANOOR HOBLI, ARAKALAGUDU-573 102, HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A) TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS IN NO. RA/159/2025-26 ON THE FILE OF RESPONDENT NO.3 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SAKALESHAPURA, SUB-DIVISION SAKALESHAPURA, VIDE ANNEXURE-J DATED 29.08.2025 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
2. The memo is taken on record. It reads as follows:-
"The petitioner submits that the petitioner challenge the entire proceedings of the respondent No.3
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51732 WP No. 32194 of 2025 before this Hon'ble Court. The authority has already been disposed the appeal on 20-11-2025. Therefore the matter does not survive for consideration. Hence the above writ petition is dismissed for infructuous."
3. In light of the same, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All contentions are kept open. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR