RSA-2771- IN THE HIG 220 Surender Sin Gaje Singh a CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP concurrent f declaration f the year 20 co-ordinate B case was lis 24.02.2015, pleadings. V counsel for t No. 8, but th order-sheets and 07.08.20 behalf of the -2014 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o der Singh Versus ingh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Ms. Simmy, Advocate for Mr. Salil Dev Singh Bali, Advo Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate fo I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant/defendant No. 1 rrent findings of both the Courts b ation filed by respondents No. 1 and 2 Perusal of the order-sheets reve 2014 and notice of motion in inate Bench of this Court way back o as listed for hearing 06 times i.e. 2015, 30.03.2015, 08.05.2015 and 21 . Vide 17.11.2015, last opportun el for the appellant for impleading the , but the needful has not been done ti sheets reveals that after 17.11.2015, o .08.2019, the case was adjourned on a of the appellant. ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2771-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.02.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate for the appellant. cate for respondents No. 1 to 6. No. 1 is in second appeal against the urts below, whereby the suit for and 2-plaintiffs was decreed. ts reveals that the matter pertains to in the same was issued by a back on 17.10.2014. Thereafter, the i.e. on 12.12.2014, 09.01.2015, and 21.08.2015, for completion of portunity was granted to learned ing the LRs of deceased-respondent one till date. Further perusal of the 015, on 02 dates i.e. on 05.02.2019 ed on account on non-appearance on t the for s to y a , the 015, n of rned dent the 019 e on RSA-2771- opportunity impleading t up for hearin proxy couns which is not 07 years, th application f has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is Court is left prosecution. 07.02.2025 rishu -2014 (O&M) -2- On the last date of hearing tunity was granted to learned cou ding the LRs of respondent No. 8. To hearing after 04 years of the last date counsel appearing for the appellant h is not justified as, since, November, 2 ars, the case is adjourned repeated ation for impleading the LRs of respon A bare reading of the above f xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha is seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable earing i.e. 12.02.2020, one more d counsel for the appellant for . 8. Today, when this case has come t date i.e. 12.02.2020, again learned llant has prayed for an adjournment ber, 2017, i.e. for the last more than peatedly, on the pretext of filing respondent No. 8. ove facts shows that the appellant tude in his pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ear that neither the appellant nor his uing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ore for ome rned ent than iling llant sent the the terly this