Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89126 (MAD)

PARIMALA @ RAMU v. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAHR

WP/32803/2025 · 2025-09-04

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.32803 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.09.2025 CORAM The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Writ Petition No.32803 of 2025 Parimala@Ramu ...Petitioner Vs. The Special Tahsildhar, (Land acquisition) The Nation Highway Projects, Tiruvallur. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18/06/2025 within a stipulated time period fixed by this Court and further direct the respondents to release the correct compensation for the acquisition of the petitioner's property in SF.No.183/3C at Kattupakkam Village, Tiruvallur District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muruganantham For Respondent : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader *** 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32803 of 2025 O R D E R Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking direction to the Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 18/06/2025 within a stipulated time period fixed by this Court and further direct the respondent to release the correct compensation for the acquisition of the petitioner's property in SF.No.183/3C at Kattupakkam Village, Tiruvallur District. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the Petitioner's property is subjected to land acquisition proceedings and when the award for compensation is calculated, compensation for building is not included in the calculation. That apart, the actual extent under the acquisition is also wrongly calculated because of the mistake committed by the respondent's office. Hence the petitioner had given a representation to the respondent on 18.06.2025. As the same did not evoke any response, the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32803 of 2025 petitioner has come forward with this writ petition seeking for the aforesaid relief. 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent would submit that the respondent will pass orders on the representation of the petitioner on merits and in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 5. Heard both sides. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the submissions made, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondent to pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 18.06.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the petitioner and also affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32803 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. arr communicate the decision taken to the petitioner. 7. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Post 'For Reporting Compliance' on 10.11.2025. 04.09.2025 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No arr To The Special Tahsildhar, (Land acquisition) The Nation Highway Projects, Tiruvallur. Writ Petition No.32803 of 2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.32803 of 2025 04.09.2025 5/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis