Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8912 (UTT)

TEJ SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/369/2021 · 2025-08-04

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6828-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/369/2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Per – Hon’ble Majoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Kaparuwan, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Neeti Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Puran Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Ms. Shazia Parveen, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate for respondent No. 4. 2. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Kaparuwan, learned counsel holding brief of Ms. Neeti Rana, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes statement at the Bar that writ petition has become infructuous with efflux of time. 3. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 04.08.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.08.04 14:47:42 +05'30'