Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89114 (ALL)

TARUN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/30557/2025 · 2025-10-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 30557 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that their father was issued a Scheduled Caste certificate of the ‘Dhangarh’ category. The petitioners, being similarly situated, are also entitled to the issuance of caste certificates in the same category. However, respondent no. 4 is not issuing the caste certificates to the petitioners. Aggrieved by the said inaction, the petitioners have approached the District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee (respondent no. 2) by filing an appeal, a copy of which is annexed at page 18 of the writ petition. However, the said appeal has not yet been considered or decided by the Committee. 3. Learned Standing Counsel would contend that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioners. 4. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioners to submit a detailed representation enclosing therewith the copy of application appearing on page 18 of memo of writ petition within a period of one month before respondent no.2/ District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, through its Chairman, District Magistrate, Ghaziabad. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : A.C.Tiwari(Ac), Manoj Kumar Rajpal, Nitin Rajpal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Tarun Kumar And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioners, the respondent no.2/ District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, through its Chairman, District Magistrate, Ghaziabad, shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioners within a period of one month thereafter. October 9, 2025 Virendra WRIC No. 30557 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad