IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4279 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2024 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Sanjay Mukhiya S/O Rameshwar Mukhiya R/O Village- Haripur Ward No.- 07, P.S- Bhargama, Distt.- Araria. 2. Jaso Mukhiya @ Yasodhar Mukhiya S/O Kameshwar Mukhiya R/O Village- Haripur Ward No.-07, P.S- Bhargama, Distt.- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md Ziaul Quamar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, 20 liters illicit liquor was recovered from the house of these petitioners. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that no incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners and they are no way connected with the aforesaid recovery. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4279 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/2 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State submits that 20 liters illicit liquor was recovered from the house of petitioners. He further submits that this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.). 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, anticipatory bail application of the petitioners is rejected. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T