Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89096 (MAD)

KARUPPUSAMY v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/39389/2025 · 2025-10-22

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.39389 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.10.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.39389 of 2025 Karuppusamy S/o. Bairan, Door No.198(3), Rice Mill Street, Nallur Village, Doddathimmanahalli Krishnagiri District. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector O/o. Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Krishnagiri District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39389 of 2025 4.The Thasildhar Thasildhar Office, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 5.The Village Administrative Officer Nallur Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 6.The Firkha Surveyor Denkanikottai Firkha, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 7.Rajamanickam S/o. Muniyan Nellur Village, Doddathimmanahalli Krishnagiri District. 8.Murali S/o. Rajamanickam Nellur Village, Doddathimmanahalli Krishnagiri District. Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.07.2025. For Petitioner: Mr.V.Sakkarapani For Respondents: Mr.T.K.Saravanan Addl. Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39389 of 2025 Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Spl. G.P. (HR & CE) for respondent No.2 Mr.P.Satheeshkumar for respondent Nos.7 and 8 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Through this public interest litigation, without making proper research, a prayer has been made for removal of the private respondents on the allegation of encroachment on temple land. 2. Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the HR & CE Department would submit that, as a matter of fact, a writ petition [W.P.No.4352 of 2025] was earlier filed before this court by one Rajamanickam, who is seventh respondent herein, and that petition has also been decided by this court on 10.2.2025. 3. In the light of the aforesaid submission, it is ostensibly clear that the petitioner has approached this court without ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39389 of 2025 conducting any research. Therefore, without commenting upon the merits of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 22.10.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39389 of 2025 To: 1.The District Collector O/o. Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District 2.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Board, Krishnagiri District 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Revenue Divisional Office, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District 4.The Thasildhar Thasildhar Office, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District 5.The Village Administrative Officer Nallur Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District 6.The Firkha Surveyor Denkanikottai Firkha, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.39389 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (sasi) W.P.No.39389 of 2025 22.10.2025 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis