- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46605 CRL.RP No. 302 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 302 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. DEVENDRA RAO T. D. S/O LATE DASHARATHARAO, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT 1st CROSS, CHOWDESHWARI COLONY, TARIKERE TOWN, TARIKERE TQ, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 547. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KALLEGOWDA S.K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CHIKKAMAGALURU, REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 101. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TARIKERE POLICE STATION, TARIKERE Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46605 CRL.RP No. 302 of 2023 CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 547 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. N. ANITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE BY THE ORDER OF EXTERNMENT DATED 21.02.2023 BEARING IN ORDER NO.J1/M.A.G.(GADIPARU)/240/2022-23 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AT CHIKKAMAGALURU, RESPONDENT NO.1. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Challenging order dated 21.02.2023 passed by respondent no.1, this Revision Petition is filed. 2. Sri Kallegowda S.K., learned counsel for petitioner submitted under impugned order District Magistrate, Chikmagaluru-respondent no.1 passed an order of 'externment' of petitioner from Chikmagaluru district for a period a period of one year from 21.02.2023 to 20.02.2024. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:46605 CRL.RP No. 302 of 2023 3. It was submitted that on said order this Court had granted an interim order of stay and during pendency of this petition, said period has lapsed. 4. In view of above, learned counsel for petitioner submitted order impugned having been spent, Revision Petition has become infructuous. 5. Submission is not opposed. 6. Hence, Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19 CT: BHK