Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8909 (CHH)

CHHATTISGARH INSTITUTE OF NURSING v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1298/2021 · 2025-02-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:10164 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1298 of 2021 1. Chhattisgarh Institute Of Nursing Through The Principal C.G. Institute Of Nursing Near Uslapur Over Bridge Nature City Campus , Mungeli Road Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. Carrier College Of Nursing Through The Director Carrier College Of Nursing Loying Road, Near Flyover Besides Old Age Home Post Jurda, Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3. V.M. College Of Nursing Through The Director V.M. College Of Nursing Infront Of Jainagar Police Station Bishrampur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary To The Govt. Of Chhattisgarh Department Of Medical Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Police Station Rakhi Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Director Directorate Of Medical Education, Old Nursing Hostel, Mantralaya Campus, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh CG 492001 3. Indian Nursing Council Through Registrar Indian Nursing Council 8th Floor, NBCC Centre , Plot No 2 Community Centre, Okhla Phase I New Delhi 110020 4. Chhattisgarh Nurses Registration Council Through The Registrar, Chhattisgarh Nurses Registration Council Old Nurses Hostel Directorate Health Services Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Anurag Dayal Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondent No. 3 For Respondent No. 4 : : : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General Ms. Jyoti Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/02/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed as order impugned has been withdrawn by the respondent authorities and the petitioners were permitted to take admission by virtue of interim order; thus, he would pray to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to revive it if cause of action subsists. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would not oppose the submission made by counsel for the petitioners. 3. Recording the submission made by counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti