Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89087 (PNJ)

HARI SINGH & ORS v. RAM PHAL & ORS

RSA/5458/2015 · 2025-01-08

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN T 225 HARI SINGH & RAM PHAL & O CORAM: HON Present: None Mr. J NIDHI GUPTA This judgments and de by them has been The there was no rep Bench of this Cou the appellants abo Offic been duly notified behalf of the appe Orde proceeded ex part In th would be a futile present second ap plaintiffs/appellan IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH RSA-5458-2015 Date of Decision H & ORS …Appellan Versus & ORS ….Respond HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI G None for the appellants. Mr. Jitender Nara, Advocate for the r *** PTA, J. (ORAL) This is the plaintiffs-appellants and decrees passed by the Courts belo s been dismissed. The appeal pertains to the year 2015 no representation on behalf of the ap is Court had directed the Registry to about the next date of hearing. Office report indicates that learned otified vide letter No.13470 dated 05. e appellants. Order sheet shows that all responden parte. In the aforesaid premise, issuance of futile exercise. It appears that due t ond appeal before this Court for a per pellants, have lost interest in pursuing NJAB AND HARYANA 2015 (O&M) cision : 08.01.2025 llants espondents DHI GUPTA r the respondents. llants second appeal against the rts below whereby the civil suit filed r 2015. On the last date of hearing, appellants as such a coordinate ry to intimate the learned counsel for arned counsel for the appellants had ted 05.09.2024. Yet none appears on ondents No.1 to 9 have already been nce of fresh notice to the appellants due to sheer long pendency of the r a period of more than 09 years, the rsuing the same, as no attempt has the filed ring, inate l for had s on been s f the , the PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.14 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-5458-2015 been made by the as it may, in view appeal is dismisse an appropriate ap the same, if so, ad Pend January 08, 2025 ps 2015 -2- them to contact their counsel or to in view of the foregoing circumstanc ismissed for non-prosecution, with libe ate application within a period of 06 m so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, also st , 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable l or to engage a new counsel. Be that stances, the instant regular second ith liberty to the appellants, to move f 06 months from today for reviving also stand disposed of. (NIDHI GUPTA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No that cond ove iving PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.14 15:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document