IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2026 of 2025 ------ Ramesh Thakur @ Ramesh Kumar Thakur, aged about 43 years, son of Shiv Kumar Thakur, resident of Village Bishunpura, P.O. Kocheya, P.S. Bishunpura, District- Garhwa (Jharkhand) .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Syed Tafazzul Sajid, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27-03-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No.70 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No.395 of 2010 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder the informant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that due to malafide intention of the informant, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that in the Supervision Report during the investigation of the case, it has been mentioned that the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence, was found to be not true. It is further submitted that the learned court has taken cognizance against the co-accused persons against whom charge-sheet has been submitted and though the petitioner was not sent up for trial but the learned Magistrate, differing from the charge-sheet, has taken cognizance of the offence against the petitioner, as well. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.- 1st Class, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No.70 of 2010 corresponding to G.R. No.395 of 2010 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/