Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89061 (PAT)

Nagendra Mahto v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./3775/2025 · 2025-05-05

Rajesh Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3775 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2024 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Nagendra Mahto Son of Late Kishuni Mahto Resident of village- Pataura Lala Tola, P.S-Muffasil, Distrist- East Champaran 2. Tej Bahadur Mahto @ Tej Mahto Son of Late Kishuni Mahto Resident of village- Pataura Lala Tola, P.S-Muffasil, Distrist- East Champaran 3. Rajan Mahto Son of Nagendra Mahto Resident of village Pataura Lala Tola P.S-Muffasil, Distrist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vishal Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 05-05-2025 Heard Mr. Vishal Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mrs. Rina Sinha, learned APP for the State. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh application. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. Office is directed to supply the certified copy of the impugned order as well as certified copy of the F.I.R. to the counsel for the petitioners. Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T