IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19815 of 2024 ====================================================== Putul Kumari Wife of Pankaj Kumar, Resident of Village - Majdiya, P.O. - Muradpur, Tola Devipur, P.S. - Kursela, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar. 3. The District Magistrate Katihar, District- Katihar. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Manihari, District- Katihar. 5. The Circle Officer, Manihari, District- Katihar. 6. Ramakant Singh Son of Late Srikant Singh Resident of Village - Nawabganj, P.O. - Nawabganj, Ward no. 1, P.S. - Manihari, District- Katihar. 7. Kamlakant Singh Son of Late Srikant Singh Resident of Village - Nawabganj, P.O. - Nawabganj, Ward No. 1, P.S. - Manihari, District- Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harish Chandra Patel, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Government Pleader 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 2 07-01-2025 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- “1. That this writ application is being filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to remove the encroachment, which has been made south of land situated at Mauza- Nawabganj, appertaining to Thana no. 294, khata no. 22, khesara no. 213, area 33 decimal, which is Aam rasta and has been encroached by the Patna High Court CWJC No.19815 of 2024(2) dt.07-01-2025 2/2 respondents no. 6 and 7, for which petitioner has filed several applications before respondents but the same have not been considered as yet and further the respondents be directed to remove the encroachment made by the encroachers, who have illegally encroached the rasta of the petitioner and villagers.” 2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3. The writ petition stands disposed off. S.Sb/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) U