- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26384 RP No. 403 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.403 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. SRI M ASWATHNARAYANA SON OF LATE MARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 9, MATHRU NILAYA, 2ND CROSS, SADARAHALLI, BYANNA LAYOUT, HEBBAL, BENGALURU-560024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AMARESH A ANGADI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MS BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BEGNALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26384 RP No. 403 of 2024 BENGALURU-560009. 4. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH (ADDITIONAL TALUK YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064. 5. SRI B G LAKSHMIKANTHARAJ SETTY SON OF GOVINDA SETTY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING AT SHENIVARA SANTE, VILLAGE AND POST, BADIKERE TALUK, REPRESENTING BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI B K GOPALA SHETTY, S/O B R KRISHNAIAH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.16, 1ST FLOOR, CENTRAL STREET, 5TH BLOCK, K P WEST, BENGALURU-560020. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 ) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN WP NO. 3409/2022 DATED 19.06.2024. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26384 RP No. 403 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Smt. Navya Shekar, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents 1 to 4. 2. In this Revision Petition the petitioner is assailing the order dated 19.06.2024 in W.P.No.3409 of 2022. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. Sri. Amaresh A. Angadi, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, submitted that the land in question falls within the jurisdiction of the 'Bangalore City Planning Area' as per the Notification dated 09.04.1984. Therefore, the order requires reconsideration. 5. Having taken note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26384 RP No. 403 of 2024 taking into consideration the dispute between the parties, which is to be concluded in RFA No. 1665 of 2014 and also it is observed that, even if the land in question comes within the purview of the 'Bangalore City Planning Area' the rights of the parties would be concluded in the above appeal. In that view of the matter, following the declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Shri Ram Sahu (dead) through legal representatives and others vs. Vinod Kumar Rawat and others reported in 2020 SCC online SC 896, I do not find error apparent on the face of the record. Accordingly, the Revision Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20