IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1069 OF 2022 (POS) BETWEEN 1 . SRI SHABEER SAHEB, S/O LATE MOHAMMED SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT PADUKERE, KOTA VILLAGE, KOTA POST, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. 2 . SMT. RAMEEZA BANU, D/O LATE MOHAMMED SAHEB, W/O ABDUL RAZAK, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT NEAR AGRAHARA TEMPLE, KATAPADI POST, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. 3 . SMT. ZEENATH, D/O LATE MOHAMMED SAHEB, W/O ABDUL REHEMAN, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, …2 RSA NO.1069/2022 2 R/AT MISSION COMPOUND, BAILURU OF 76 BADAGUBETTU, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. 4 . SMT. SHARFUNISA, D/O LATE MOHAMMED SAHEB, W/O FAKIR SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT PADUKERE, KOTE VILLAGE AND POST, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. 5 . SMT. SAMSHEERA, D/O LATE MOHAMMED SAHEB, W/O MOHAMMED SAB, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT PUNCHALKADU, KAUP POST, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. 6 . SMT. MUNAVAR BANU, D/O LATE MOHAMMED SAHEB, W/O NAZIR AHAMED, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT PALUKOTE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. …3 RSA NO.1069/2022 3 7 . SMT. KURSHEEDA BANU, DAUGHTER-IN-LAW OF LATE MOHAMMED SAHEB, W/O SALIM, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT PADUKOTE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri./Smt : PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATE ) AND SRI KALIYAMARDHANA KRISHNA DEVARU OF SRI KRISHNAPURA MUTT, UDUPI, REP. BY IT’S MATADHIPATHI, H. H. VIDHYASAGAR THIRTHA SWAMIER, DISCIPLE OF SRIMAD, H. H. VIDHYASAGAR THIRTHA, SWAMIER OF SRI KRISHNAPURA MUTT, CAR STREET, UDUPI. …RESPONDENT/S REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.01.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.31/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, UDUPI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.01.2018 PASSED IN OS.NO.518/2014 ON TH FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, UDUPI. …4 RSA NO.1069/2022 4 This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:- ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellants seeks time to comply with the office objections. Hence, on further cost of Rs.500/- payable at Registry, another two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. If cost is not paid and the office objections are not complied within two weeks, the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 17.07.2025, office objections are not complied with and Hence, the appeal is hereby dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: SR R By: VS C By: GS Ty Date: 31.10.2025 C Date: 04.11.2025