Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89028 (PNJ)

UMESH KUMAR VATS v. B.V. RAMANA REDDY AND ANOTHER

COCP/3006/2023 · 2025-09-15

Alka Sarin

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

102 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3006-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.09.2025 UMESH KUMAR VATS .... Petitioner VERSUS B.V. RAMANA REDDY AND ANR .... Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. Ritender Rathee, Advocate for Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Nilesh Kant Goyal, Advocate for Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for the respondents. ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to avail the remedies as available in law. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. 15.09.2025 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2025.09.16 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment