Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8902 (UTT)

MUSAIYYDA RANI ALIAS RANI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/775/2025 · 2025-07-10

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5961 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/775/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Amit Kapri, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Tumul Nailwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate with Mr. Chitrarath Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant is praying for anticipatory bail in relation to FIR dated 19.06.2025 bearing FIR No. 0182 of 2025, Police Station – Vikas Nagar, District – Dehradun wherein present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 8, 21, 29 of the NDPS Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present applicant is innocent and has been implicated falsely. He further submits that present applicant has been implicated only on the basis of statement made by co-accused Nazmeen @ Munni though she has no connection with co-accused Nazmeen @ Munni. 5. On the other side, learned State Counsel on instructions submits that applicant has criminal history of three cases, out of which, two pertains to NDPS Act. 6. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration the seriousness of the offences and the fact that applicant has past criminal history of three cases, out of which, two pertains to NDPS Act, this Court is of the view that applicant does not deserve for anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail is rejected. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 10.07.2025. SKS