Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 89014 (ALL)

TAPARNAV PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/28830/2025 · 2025-09-15

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 28830 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an order in proceedings 41 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act was passed way back in the year 2011. The private-respondents had filed a restoration application which has been dismissed on 01.09.2025. Learned ocunsel for the petitioner submits that the order till date has not been carried out. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit, the writ petition is disposed of requiring the respondent no. 2 to proceed with the matter in case there are no legal impediment and no appeal has been preferred by the private-respondents which is pending consideration. In case, there is no legal impediment, the order passed in the year 2011 may be carried out within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of. September 16, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brahm Prakash Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Taparnav Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad