SIMRANJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/8561/2025 · 2025-08-08
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89009 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 89009 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
107
CRWP-8561-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8561-2025 Date of decision: 08.08.2025
SIMRANJEET KAUR AND ANR. ….Petitioners
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. D.S. Nigha, Advocate for Dr. Prabhjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the respondents No.4 to 5 not to interfere in their lives and liberty. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 05.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Patiala and he shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation 05.08.2025 (Annexure P-5).
2. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage.
3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG Punjab, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. Puneet Sharma 2025.08.08 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
107
CRWP-8561-2025 -2-
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2–The Senior Superintendent of Police, District Patiala is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation dated 05.08.2025 (Annexure P-5) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate
order, in accordance with law. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
5. With these observations, this petition is disposed of.
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 08.08.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.08.08 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment