HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29512 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary affidavit has been filed by Shri Diwanshu Tiwari, learned counsel fo the applicant today in the Court, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Diwanshu Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 12/2024, under Sections 420, 34, 120B IPC and under Section 66D I.T. Act, P.S.- Cyber Crime, P.S.- Kannauj, District- Kannauj, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is not named in the FIR. The name of applicant has came up in the confessional statement of co-accused Sachin Das, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Criminal history of one case has been explained by the applicant in supplementary affidavit in which applicant has already been granted bail, copy of bail order has been annexed as SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is languishing in jail since 22.04.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Diwanshu Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ajay Kumar Mandal .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Ajay Kumar Mandal, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 11, 2025 Sharad/- BAIL No. 29512 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad