IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2799 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Saharsa ====================================================== Abhimanyu Kumar Son of Subodh Thakur@ Subodh Kumar Resident of village- Chankayapuri, Ward No.- 31, Meera Tokies Road, P.S.- Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewanand Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 27-06-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State. 2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 21.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 57786 of 2024. 3. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66, 66(C), 66(D) of the I.T. Act and Section 3/4 of the Pubic Gambling Act. 4. The following order was passed on 21.08.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 57786 of 2024 :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Saharsa Cyber P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2799 of 2025(3) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code; Sections 66, 66© and 66(D) of the IT Act and Section 3/4 of the Public Gambling Act. 3. The petitioner and other criminals are alleged to have been involved in a cyber crime. During search different ATM cards and cheque books etc. have been recovered from them. The accused persons are members of cyber fraud gang. The petitioner is in jail since 13.05.2024. 4. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that sufficient material has come during investigation to connect the petitioner with the crime. 5. Considering the fact that petitioner is involved in cyber crime, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. This application for regular bail is dismissed. 5. The trial has started and two witnesses have been examined. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected. 8. The court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner. anand/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T