Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88997 (KAR)

SUVARNAMMA v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/13608/2024 · 2025-07-24

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28291 WP No. 13608 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 13608 OF 2024 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: SUVARNAMMA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O LATE NANJAMARI, KUNDUR, KIBBANAHALLI HOBLI, TIPTUR TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 226. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE) AND: ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TIPTUR SUB-DIVISION, TIPTUR, TUMAKURU DISTRICT – 572 226. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION DATED 02.01.2023 (ANNEXURE-D) FOR PAYMENT OF ENHANCED COMPENSATION AT RS.1,500/- PER Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28291 WP No. 13608 of 2024 GUNTA ALONG WITH INTEREST AT 6 PERCENT P.A. FROM THE DATE OF ACQUISITION TILL THE DATE OF ACTUAL PAYMENT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER A coordinate bench of this Court, on 06.11.2024, had granted two weeks time to the petitioner, to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, this Court on 03.06.2025 had granted a week’s time and on 17.06.2025 passed a preemptory order granting a week’s time to comply with the office objections. Even today, office objections have not been complied with. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BKP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 132