HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31050 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. The petitioner, before this Court, claims that he has moved an application under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for removing the encroachment made by private respondent nos. 5 to 9. The said application was rejected against which an appeal was preferred which has also been rejected. 2. I have heard respective counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. 3. No case for interference under Article 226 of Constitution of India is made out. 4. The writ petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. September 9, 2025 V.S.Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shitlesh Pandey, Shivendra Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Vijay Shankar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad