Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54035 CMP No. 346 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 346 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
M/S EMIRATE X24 PVT LTD DBS HOUSE 26, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE 560052 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. SIRSENDU CHAKARBOTY …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJI KUMAR A, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
MR. SUSOVAN CHATTERJEE N92, N TYPE TELO COMPANY, JAMSHEDPUR - 831 004 PH NO. 917209000356
2.
MRS. BEAUTY GOSWAMI N92, N TYPE TELCO COMPANY JAMSHEDPUR - 831 004 PH NO. 917209000356 …RESPONDENTS (NIL)
THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.11(5) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING TO A) APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR TO ADJUDICATE THE DISPUTES BETWEEN THE PETITIONER COMPANY AND RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2, IN PURSUANCE OF THE CLAUSE J MENTIONED IN PAGE NO.18 AND 19 OF THE AGREEMENT OF ENGAGEMENT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54035 CMP No. 346 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Appoint a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the petitioner company and respondent no.1 and 2, in pursuance of the Clause J mentioned in page No.18 and 19 of the agreement of engagement.
b. Frame the terms of reference taking into
consideration the disputes between the parties and refer subject matter of the terms of reference to the sole arbitrator for adjudication within a time frame.
c. Pass such other and further orders as this Hon’ble court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
2. None appears for the petitioner.
3. Despite the order dated 28.11.2025, neither the process fee has been paid nor is there any appearance on the part of the petitioner.
4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 113