[2025:RJ-JP:29410] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3864/2025 Gajendra Singh S/o Shri Padam Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Baroda, Tehsil Bayana, District- Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Pramod Mandar S/o Shri Mangat Ram Kankra, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kankra, Kishangarh Bas, Khairthal- Tijara, Alwar (Rajasthan) At Present R/o Vinayak Enclave Jagatpura Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1203/2025 Vibhav Pal Singh Son Of Shri Karan Pal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 01,pushpanjali Colony, Near Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Pramod Mandar Son Of Shri Mangat Ram Kankra, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Kankra, Kishangarh Bas, Khairthal- Tijara, Alwar (Rajasthan). At Present Resident Of Vinayak Enclave Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1491/2025 1. Avinash Son Of Rajkumar Sharma, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Sapotara, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj). 2. Prayag Choudhary Son Of Shri Suresh Choudhary, Resident Of Samochiya Thok, Nogohi, District Deeg (Raj). 3. Ravi Sharma Son Of Shri Bajrang Lal, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 21, Shiv Vihar, Mangawas, Mansarowar, Jaipur (Raj). 4. Mukesh Choudhary Son Of Shri Babu Lal Choudhary, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of B-333, Jagdamba Nagar, [2025:RJ-JP:29410] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3864/2025] Dhabas Road, Jaipur ( Rajasthan). 5. Shashank Pandit Son Of Shri Devendra Kumar Gautam, Resident Of Shivalo Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 16, Chaksu, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Pramod Mandar Son Of Shri Mangat Ram Kankra, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Kankra, Kishangarh Bas, Khairthal- Tijara, Alwar ( Rajasthan) At Present Resident Of Vinayak Enclave Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Karanpal Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rajveer Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 01/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petitions. Accordingly, the instant petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that instant petitions are dismissed for want of criminal antecedents. Howsoever, liberty is granted to the petitioners to take appropriate recourse, in accordance with the law. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/47-49