Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88978 (ALL)

AMARNATH CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/31377/2025 · 2025-10-09

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31377 of 2025 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Counsel for the informant has raised objection that applicant has not availed remedy available to him by filing appeal. 2. The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act, cannot be allowed to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 3. In view of the aforesaid judgment, the applicant is permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. 4. The application is, accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy. 5. Certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet be returned to the applicant as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy of the same on the record. October 10, 2025 Meenu Singh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Kiran Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Pramod Kumar Singh, G.A. (Deepak Verma,J.) Amarnath Chaudhary .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad