MUKESH YADAV AND 10 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/18859/2025 · 2025-09-17
Abdul Shahid, Siddhartha Varma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18859 of 2025 Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. Upon being informed by the learned A.G.A. that a charge-sheet has been forwarded by the Police in the instant matter, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to avail such remedy as might be available under the law.
2. Under such circumstances, no further order is required to be passed.
3. The instant writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 18, 2025 M. Tarik Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdul Shahid,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Mukesh Yadav And 10 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD TARIK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad