MUNDAR PATEL @ MANEENDRA KUMAR PATEL AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/31668/2025 · 2025-09-15
Dinesh Pathak
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88957 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 88957 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 31668 of 2025 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Learned AGA has filed a copy of the compliance affidavit today in Court, which is taken on record.
2. The applicants have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 BNSS to assail the order dated 3.7.2025, whereby charges have been framed against the accused (applicants herein).
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 has raised a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the instant application on the ground of availability of alternative remedy to file an appeal under Section 14-A of the SC/ST Act.
4. After due deliberations at length, learned counsel for the applicants has prayed to dismiss the instant application as withdrawn with liberty to resort to appropriate remedy under the SC/ST Act.
5. As such, instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
6. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the documents/orders to the learned counsel for the applicants after retaining its photostat copy at relevant places. September 16, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Yogendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajeev Ratan Shukla (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Mundar Patel @ Maneendra Kumar Patel And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad