Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 88949 (PNJ)

RAJBIR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/22931/2025 · 2025-08-08

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-22931-2025 (O&M). -1- IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 111 CWP-22931-2025 (O&M). Date of Decision: 08.08.2025. RAJBIR ... Petitioner(s) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Ms. Jyoti Pandey, Advocate, and Mr. M.M. Pandey, Advocate, for the petitioners. Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana (Through Video Conference). VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present writ petition is for directing the respondents to re-fix the pay of the petitioner after granting him the notional pay/increments with relative inter se seniority from the date persons lower in merit were allowed to join in the year 2018 against Advt. dated 30.12.2016 issued by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the controversy in the present writ petition is covered by the ratio of the judgment RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.11 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22931-2025 (O&M). -2- passed by this Court in the matter of Dusyant Sharma Vs. State of Haryana and others, CWP No.3095-2023, decided on 22.05.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) contends that the petitioner(s) would be satisfied, at this juncture, in case respondent No.4 is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner as espoused in the present writ petition as well as the aforesaid judgment passed by this Court by passing a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner. 3 Notice of motion. 4 Dr. (Ms.) Malvika Singh, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and she has no objection to the above request. 5 Accordingly, with the consent of the parties and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.4-Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Division No.2, Rohtak, to decide the claim espoused by the petitioner(s) in the present writ petition by treating the same as a representation and to pass a fresh speaking and reasoned order thereupon in accordance with law in terms of the facts pleaded herein as well as after taking into consideration the judgment passed by this Court in the matter of Dusyant Sharma (supra) within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and a copy of present petition along with accompanying Annexures. RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.11 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-22931-2025 (O&M). -3- 6 Needless to mention that if upon considering the said representation, in case any amount is found due and payable to the petitioner(s), the same shall be disbursed in favour of the petitioner(s) within a further period of two months. August 08, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.11 11:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document